Cameroun - Environnement. Study reveals: Cameroon Ranks Among the Best Countries With the Lowest CO2 Emissions Caused by Animal Product Consumption

cameroun24.net Mardi le 08 Mai 2018 Opinion Imprimer Envoyer cet article à Nous suivre sur facebook Nous suivre sur twitter Revoir un Programme TV Grille des Programmes TV Où Vendre Où Danser Où Dormir au Cameroun
Cameroon is ranked #111 in the index, emitting on average 33.15 kg of CO2 per person annually for animal products and 12.89 kg of CO2 per person annually for non-animal products.

ADS

Berlin, Germany, 08/05/2018 - Intelligent nutrition retailer nu3, has released a study comparing carbon dioxide emissions for 130 countries worldwide based on dietary habits. With the environmental impacts of humanity's eating preferences at the forefront of discussion, the nutrition specialist wanted to further the debate by looking into the food industry’s carbon footprint, directly comparing different diets in terms of carbon dioxide emissions. The study reveals which countries could significantly reduce their carbon footprint by switching to a plant-based diet, as well as which food types generate the highest carbon dioxide emissions.

 

Using data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the study compares figures for each country on the following topics:

 

  • The quantity of 11 types of food supplied for consumption. Seven of these are popular animal products, such as beef, chicken, and milk, including cheese. Non-animal products include soybeans and nuts, including peanut butter.

  • The annual carbon dioxide emissions for each food type, per person.

  • The annual CO2 difference between 1 kg of animal product and 1 kg of non-animal product. This figure indicates how many kg of CO2 an individual could reduce their carbon footprint by per year if they switched from an animal to a non-animal diet.

 

The study began by analysing data from the FAO to determine the quantity of produce supplied for consumption of 11 food types in 130 countries. This included seven animal products (pork, poultry, beef, lamb & goat, fish, eggs, and milk including cheese) and four non-animal products (wheat and wheat products, rice, soybeans, and nuts including peanut butter). Next, using the worldwide average CO2 emission figures for supplying each food type for consumption, the annual quantity of CO2 per capita for each product could be determined. In this way, an average annual CO2 emission per capita for animal and non-animal products could be found for each country. Finally, the difference between these average figures was calculated, revealing the kg of CO2 a citizen in each country could reduce annually by replacing 1 kg of animal product with 1 kg of non-animal product.

 

“Veganism is an increasingly mainstream lifestyle choice, as demonstrated by our vegan product revenue doubling in the last year alone. With this study revealing how switching diets could drastically reduce our carbon footprint, it’s becoming increasingly harder to ignore the benefits of moving to a plant-based diet, both for our health and our planet.” says Robert Sünderhauf, CEO at nu3. “For those who find the idea of completely giving up meat a challenge, this index highlights some realistic and achievable alternatives. For instance, healthier fish and poultry have a far lower CO2 emission rate than fattier red meats such as lamb and beef, while eggs produce significantly lower emission rates than milk products and cheese. All evidence points towards a mainly plant-based diet, with lean animal-based protein if needed, to help both our bodies and our environment prosper.”

 

Please find the full results of the study here: https://www.nu3.com/c/food-carbon-footprint-index-2018/

 

‘Consumption’ in the tables below refers to the amount of produce supplied for consumption (kg/person/year).

‘Carbon Footprint’ refers to the kg of CO2 per person, per year.

 

The following table reveals a sample of the results for Cameroon:

 

Results for Cameroon , # 111

Animal Products

 

Non-Animal Products

Animal vs. Non-Animal Products

Pork

Beef

Fish

Wheat & Wheat Products

Rice

Nuts inc. Peanut Butter

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Difference - Kg CO2/person/year

1.47

5.20

4.17

128.68

14.71

23.49

22.60

4.31

23.85

30.52

9.29

16.44

20.26



The following table reveals a sample of the results for the top 15 countries who could reduce their carbon footprint the most by switching from an animal to a non-animal diet:

 

   

Animal Products

Non-Animal Products

Animal vs. Non-Animal Products

   

Pork

Beef

Wheat & Wheat Products

Nuts inc. Peanut Butter

#

Country

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Consumption

Carbon Footprint

Difference - Kg CO2/person/year

1

Argentina

10.51

37.20

55.48

1712.00

103.11

19.66

0.49

0.87

297.87

2

Australia

24.14

85.44

33.86

1044.85

70.46

13.44

8.73

15.45

260.02

3

Iceland

21.69

76.77

13.36

412.26

72.92

13.91

3.88

6.87

237.20

4

Albania

10.88

38.51

22.50

694.30

138.64

26.44

4.36

7.72

236.65

5

New Zealand

22.29

78.90

22.49

693.99

76.91

14.67

8.22

14.55

233.97

6

United States

27.64

97.83

36.24

1118.29

80.43

15.34

7.86

13.91

230.60

7

Uruguay

16.84

59.61

29.10

897.96

109.31

20.85

0.95

1.68

218.93

8

Luxembourg

43.58

154.25

29.88

922.03

103.20

19.68

0.93

1.65

217.85

9

Kazakhstan

10.36

36.67

23.38

721.46

92.31

17.60

5.14

9.10

210.84

10

Brazil

12.60

44.60

39.25

1211.17

53.00

10.11

0.67

1.19

209.73

11

Sweden

37.00

130.96

24.58

758.49

79.59

15.18

6.23

11.03

204.83

12

Bermuda

28.24

99.96

33.15

1022.94

54.88

10.47

5.72

10.12

201.06

13

Denmark

24.87

88.03

28.46

878.22

98.00

18.69

5.94

10.51

200.05

14

Finland

36.14

127.92

19.22

593.09

81.99

15.64

3.43

6.07

198.47

15

Ireland

32.40

114.68

22.35

689.67

107.98

20.59

4.10

7.26

196.03

N.B. This is a sample of the full results, which can be found here: https://www.nu3.com/c/food-carbon-footprint-index-2018/

 

ADS

 

ADS

ADS

Les plus récents

Rechercher un article

ADS

ADS